TGG/GOVERNMENT & PUBLIC SECTOR
Technology sovereignty is becoming national infrastructure.
AI models, data platforms and the infrastructure beneath them now shape what a state can decide, deliver and defend. Governments that treat these as procurement items inherit someone else's control points. Governments that treat them as infrastructure keep their own.
01 — CONTROL POINTS
Six things a state should be able to answer for.
01
Data
Where it lives, who touches it, under which law.
02
Models
Provenance, evaluation, update rights and exit paths.
03
Infrastructure
Where compute runs and who can switch it off.
04
Access
Identity, scoping and clearance-aligned authorization.
05
Operational knowledge
Institutional memory that stays when a vendor leaves.
06
Security
Architecture, monitoring and response as sovereign functions.
02 — HOW TGG ENGAGES
Evaluate. Architect. Build.
Evaluate
Sovereignty and readiness assessments, vendor and dependency risk, AI governance reviews — evidence a ministry can act on.
Architect
Reference architectures for protected data environments, sovereign AI and secure citizen services — procurement-ready.
Build
Delivery of secure software, data systems and AI capability — with deliberate transfer of knowledge to public teams.
Capability statement and technical company profile available on request for procurement and market-research purposes.
REQUEST DOCUMENTS →03 — AREAS OF WORK
TGG does not disclose client references. Nothing on this page implies existing government engagements; it describes where our disciplines apply and how we work when engaged.
Evaluating a sovereign capability?
Start with the architecture questions. We can help you ask them precisely.